This news story does interests me in the fact that some publishers lose the freaking plot if you write a romance/erotic romance book without condoms the minute there's an erection - unless a writer goes into a deep, usually convoluted reason why it is physiologically impossible for bodily fluids to pass from one character to another. Fair enough. That’s their call. But I ask this - if there are people having random non protected sex, and they read books, do you think they're going to take on board a long involved description on non possible body fluids swapping or give a crap that a writer has tried to write a condom putting on scene as hot and romantically as possible bearing in mind they’re dealing with a rubber tube? I think not. They’re still going to do what they’re gonna do. Do publishers have a moral obligation? Hmmmm…not sure on that. I do know none of us can pass judgment on another and just because you or I decree condoms must be in a book it doesn’t make it so in real life.
*********************
Amarinda Jones
Penn Halligan
www.amarindajones.com
www.amarindajones.blogspot.com
Be daring...read an Amarinda book
2 comments:
I agree with you, it's very difficult to write a condom into a romantically-charged scene. On the other hand, I had an editor who had a rule that a condom was a must. So, I wrote it into one of my stories, tried to make it work. Then got a review where the reviewer said that the fact the man had a condom with him during in unexpected sexual encounter made him a man whore. You just can't win. Do you write it in or leave it out? Are you promoting irresponsibility or creating a speed bump in a fictional situation?
There are a lot of sick people out there, people who care for no one but themself. I hope the authorities have been able to stop him. I pray for the women he's hurt.
Post a Comment